Innocence Project

An Innocence Project is one of a number of non-profit legal organizations in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand dedicated to proving the innocence of wrongly convicted people through the use of DNA testing, and to reforming the criminal justice systems to prevent future injustice.[1] The clinic’s case work is mainly handled by law students while under the supervision of attorneys and the clinic staff.[1]

Contents

Founding

United States

The Innocence Project was established in the wake of a landmark study by the United States Department of Justice and the United States Senate, in conjunction with the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, which found that incorrect identification by eyewitnesses was a factor in over 70% of wrongful convictions.[2] The original Innocence Project was founded in 1992 by Barry Scheck and Peter Neufeld as part of the Cardozo School of Law of Yeshiva University in New York City. It became an independent 501(c)(3) non-profit organization in 2003, but maintains strong institutional connections with Cardozo.[3]

Worldwide

The Innocence Project is a member of the Innocence Network, which brings together a growing number of innocence organizations from across the United States. It includes members from other English-speaking common law countries—the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Ireland.[4]

In South Africa, the Wits Justice Project investigates South African incarcerations. In partnership with the Wits Law Clinic, the Legal Resource Centre (LRC), the Open Democracy Advice Centre (ODAC), the Julia Mashele Trust, and the US Innocence Project, the Justice Project investigates individual cases of prisoners wrongly convicted or awaiting trial.[5]

Mission

In addition to working on behalf of those who may have been wrongfully convicted of crimes throughout the United States, those working for the Innocence Project performs research and advocacy related to the causes of wrongful convictions.

Some of the Innocence Project's successes have resulted in rescuing innocent people from Death Row. The successes of the project have fueled American opposition to the death penalty and have likely been a factor in the decision by some American states to institute moratoria on judicial executions.

In the decision of District Attorney's Office v. Osborne (2009), US Supreme Court Chief Justice Roberts wrote that post-conviction challenge "poses to our criminal justice systems and our traditional notions of finality better left to elected officials than federal judges." In a court opinion, another justice wrote that forensic science has "serious deficiencies". Roberts expressed a fear that post-conviction DNA testing risks "unnecessarily overthrowing the established system of criminal justice." The law professor Kevin Jon Heller wrote: "It might lead to a reasonably accurate one."[6]

Wrongful convictions

As of January 2012, 283 people previously convicted of serious crimes in the United States had been exonerated by DNA testing since 1989, seventeen of whom had been sentenced to death. Almost all (99%) of the convictions proven to be false were of males,[7] with minority groups also disproportionately represented (approximately 70%).[8]

United States Innocence Projects

In the history of the United States there have been two hundred and eighty post-convictions due to DNA testing[8] According to the New York Innocence Project these statistics were found on those exonerated:

There have been exoneration in Washington D.C and 35 states. There are innocence projects in the majority of the 50 states.[8]

New York

New York, NY is where the Innocence Project originated. The majority of clients that are helped are those who are of low socio-economic status and have used all possible legal options for justice. Before investigating a case, clients undergo a screening process in order to figure out whether or not DNA testing will lead to a wrongful conviction. Many clients are hoping that DNA evidence will prove their innocence in their cases. With the emergence of DNA testing, those who have been wrongly convicted of a crime have been able to challenge their cases. The Innocence Project also works with the local, state and federal levels of law enforcement and legislator along with other programs to prevent further wrongful convictions.[1]

North Carolina

The North Carolina Center on Actual Innocence coordinates innocence projects among all North Carolina law schools. The center is responsible for the exonerations of Dwayne Allen Dail, Keith Brown, Joseph Abbitt and more. On average, the center receives 1,000 requests but is only has a case load of about 130.[18]

Innocence Network

The Innocence Project is also a founding members of the Innocence Network, an organization of law and journalism schools along with public defense offices that work together to help convicted felons prove their innocence.[1] Forty six American states along with several other countries are a part of the network. In 2010, twenty nine people were exonerated worldwide from the work of the members of this organization.[19]

Causes

There are a plethora of reasons why wrongful convictions occur. Reasons can range from false confessions and false eyewitness identification to tunnel vision by investigators lack of effective representation from defense attorneys.[18]

In popular culture

See also

External links

Notes

  1. ^ a b c d "About Us". Innocence Project. http://www.innocenceproject.org/about/. Retrieved 2011-12-09. 
  2. ^ "Facts about Wrongful Convictions >>Mistaken Eyewitness Identifications". Mid-Atlantic Innocence Project. http://www.exonerate.org/facts/causes-of-wrongful-convictions/mistaken-eyewitness-identifications/. Retrieved 2006-12-12. 
  3. ^ "Frequently Asked Questions". Innocence Project. http://www.innocenceproject.org/about/FAQs.php. Retrieved 2011-12-09. 
  4. ^ "Mission Statement". Innocence Network. http://www.innocencenetwork.org/. Retrieved 2006-12-12. 
  5. ^ Gordin, Jeremy (August 2009). "The Justice Project". Witwatersrand, SA: Wits Journalism Programme. http://www.journalism.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1596&Itemid=506. Retrieved 2011-01-04. 
  6. ^ Lundin, Leigh (2009-06-28). "Dark Justice". Capital Punishment. Criminal Brief. http://www.criminalbrief.com/?p=7480. 
  7. ^ "Female DNA Exonerees Represent Only a Few of the Women Who Have Been Wrongfully Convicted Nationwide". The Innocence Project. http://www.innocenceproject.org/Content/Female_DNA_Exonerees_Represent_Only_a_Few_of_the_Women_Who_Have_Been_Wrongfully_Convicted_Nationwide.php. Retrieved 2012-01-03. 
  8. ^ a b c d e f "Know the Cases". Innocence Project. http://www.innocenceproject.org/know/. Retrieved 2011-12-09. 
  9. ^ a b Rogue Justice. CNN. Atlanta. 30 Jan. 2011. Television
  10. ^ "US man freed by DNA evidence after 35 years in prison". BBC News. 2009-12-18. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8419854.stm. Retrieved 2009-12-19. 
  11. ^ "Man exonerated, freed from prison after 35 years", CNN, December 17, 2009, http://edition.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/12/17/florida.dna.exoneration/index.html, retrieved December 22, 2009 
  12. ^ Marzulli, John; McShane, Larry. "Barry Gibbs, man framed by 'mafia cop,' gets $9.9M settlement for 18-year prison sentence". New York Daily News. http://www.nydailynews.com/news/ny_crime/2010/06/03/2010-06-03_barry_gibbs_man_framed_by_mafia_cop_gets_99m_settlement_for_18year_prison_senten.html. Retrieved July 6, 2010. 
  13. ^ JOYCE PURNICK, "METRO MATTERS; 19 Years Late, Freedom Has A Bitter Taste", New York Times, 3 Oct 2005, accessed 14 Aug 2010
  14. ^ "An Innocent Man on Ohio's Death Row". Columbus, Ohio: KevinKeith org. 2010-09-05. http://www.kevinkeith.org/. 
  15. ^ Driehaus, Bob (2010-09-02). "Ohio’s Governor Spares Life of a Death Row Inmate". New York Times (New York): p. A13. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/03/us/03ohio.html. 
  16. ^ Lundin, Leigh (2010-08-29). "Death and Destruction". Capital Punishment. Criminal Brief. http://www.criminalbrief.com/?p=13637. 
  17. ^ Welsh-Huggins, Andrew (2010-09-03). "Kevin Keith: Clemency overrides unanimous parole board decision". Mansfield News Journal (Mansfield, Ohio). http://www.mansfieldnewsjournal.com/article/20100903/NEWS01/9030311/Kevin-Keith-Clemency-overrides-unanimous-parole-board-decision. 
  18. ^ a b "The North Carolina Center on Actual Innocence." The North Carolina Center on Actual Innocence. http://www.nccai.org/ (accessed November 28, 2011).
  19. ^ "The Innocence Network". The Innocence Network. http://www.innocencenetwork.org/. Retrieved November 28, 2011.